While results tend to be mixed when we look at the literature as a whole, some recurring themes seem to emerge when we look at the literature in terms of differences between politics and population. For example, studies that look at the evolution of medical marijuana markets (e.g. by measuring the presence of active pharmacies or market size) consistently appear to show a positive correlation between liberalization policies and consumption among high-risk users (arrestees, people in need of treatment, and polydrug users). Similarly, many studies have shown a positive association with marijuana use in adults, while most have found no association with prevalence or frequency of use among adolescents in the general school population. The extent to which these findings can be used to draw conclusions about the possible impact of legalization on the same population groups is unclear. Just as it has taken some time for researchers to pay more attention to the different effects of policy elements over time (Hasin et al. 2015b, Pacula et al. 2015, Smart 2016, Wen et al. 2015) as well as the possible heterogeneous responses of different types of users (Pacula et al. 2015, Wen et al. 2015), it will take some time until research emerges that develops these associations in light of the complete political dynamics (i.e.

changes in a policy within a single state over time and duration of a population`s exposure to a particular type of policy). As more and more studies consider and account for these heterogeneous effects and dynamics, we can gain greater clarity on the margins that certain types of measures influence behavior or not, and for whom. The new poll follows President Joe Biden`s decision to pardon those convicted of possession of marijuana at the federal level and directs his administration to review how marijuana is classified under federal law. It was put in place ahead of the Nov. 8 midterm elections, when two states legalized recreational marijuana use — as well as 19 states and the District of Columbia, which had already done so. There are also racial and ethnic differences in views on marijuana legalization. About two-thirds of black adults (68%) and six in ten white adults say marijuana should be legal for medical and recreational use, compared to lower proportions of Hispanic (49%) and Asian (48%) adults. Ideological differences are evident within each party. About four in ten conservative Republicans (37%) say marijuana should be legal for medical and recreational use, compared to a 60% majority of moderate and liberal Republicans. A majority of 62 percent of Republicans ages 18 to 29 favor legalizing medical and recreational marijuana, compared to 52 percent of 30- to 49-year-olds. About four in ten Republicans ages 50 to 64 (41 percent) and 65 to 74 (38 percent) say marijuana should be legal for both purposes, as should 18 percent of people ages 75 and older.

In addition to physical pain, people also suffer from mental illnesses such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and anxiety. PTSD is very common in people who are veterans. They come back with a rational fear and anxiety that can overwhelm them. Therefore, marijuana use is necessary for these veterans so that their brain synapses can be regulated. Marijuana has already been approved to treat people with PTSD in many states. Among these states, New Mexico allows anyone suffering from PTSD to have an authorized medical marijuana card. The trol of nausea and vomiting is of paramount importance in the treatment of cancer patients” (“Information for Physicians” 1). The reason nausea and vomiting need to be controlled is that “these can lead to serious metabolic disorders, nutritional deficiencies, deterioration of a patient`s physical and mental condition, discontinuation of potentially beneficial and curative antineoplastic treatments, and degeneration of self-care and functioning.” (“Information for Physicians” 1). It is very important for cancer patients to control their nausea and vomiting, and marijuana seems to be able to achieve this. It seems reasonable to give patients the opportunity and make medical marijuana available for consumption.

Biomedical engineering is a part of engineering where technology focuses on medical devices. It focuses on the accuracy and automation of current devices used by professionals or doctors. The seminar showed what old devices look like. For some people, this is the case. Marijuana has already been legalized for medical purposes in California and Arizona. To pass, these laws required a majority vote of the public and Congress in favor of legalizing marijuana. In 1991, eighty percent of San Francisco voters approved the legalization of marijuana, and seventy-seven percent of Santa Cruz voters also agreed (“History of Medical Marijuana” 1). Since these laws were passed, there has been evidence of support for the legalization of marijuana for medical purposes. California and Arizona may be the only states that have legalized medical marijuana, but they are not the only states that have considered legalizing medical marijuana.

“Massachusetts had already passed laws allowing its citizens to use medical marijuana in certain circumstances” (“Reefer Madness” 2). Many states have passed laws that reduce lawsuits against doctors who prescribe marijuana (“Federal Foolishness and Marijuana” 2). There have also been numerous surveys showing that the public prefers the use of marijuana for medical purposes (“Reefer Madness” 2). With all this support for marijuana legalization, it`s only a matter of time before law enforcement of doctors who prescribe marijuana and patients who use marijuana as medicine stop. Although marijuana is regulated by federal laws, states have the ability to enforce their own drug laws. At the federal level, the Drug Enforcement Agency classifies marijuana as a Schedule 1 drug. As a Schedule 1 drug, marijuana is considered highly abusive and currently has no accepted medical use. This suggests that marijuana can be prosecuted under federal laws. Which is highly controversial given that the vast majority of states have legalized it medically. Our writers will provide you with a sample essay rewritten from scratch: every topic, every deadline, every instruction. In this article, we review the existing literature on the effects of decriminalization and medical marijuana laws on marijuana use and marijuana-related disorders in light of these restrictions.

Unlike other journals, our goal is not to summarize all the existing literature on the effects of decriminalization and medicalization. Rather, the aim of this review is to provide a better understanding of what can be gained from the literature by taking greater account of the complexity of these policies, the populations studied, and the measures of use considered. In this way, we can communicate the need for more research in terms of measurement and analysis before we can truly understand the effects of marijuana liberalization policies.